The Effect of Fluid Challenge Test on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter


Creative Commons License

Komurcu O., Dost B., Akdemir N. U., Ülger F.

JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, cilt.32, sa.9, ss.1116-1121, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 32 Sayı: 9
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.29271/jcpsp.2022.09.1116
  • Dergi Adı: JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1116-1121
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Fluid therapy, Stroke volume, Intracranial pressure, Ultrasonography, Optic nerve sheath diameter, RESPONSIVENESS, SEPSIS
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To investigate the effect of the fluid challenge test on the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) change. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Hospital, Samsun, Turkey, from January to November 2021. Methodology: A fluid challenge was defined as a 500 mL crystalloid infusion administered over 10 minutes, and fluid responsiveness was defined as a subsequent increase in stroke volume of at least 15% administered to the ICU patients. The ONSD and hemodynamic variables were measured by ultrasonography before (T0), at the end (T1), and 30 min after the fluid challenge (T2). The primary outcome of the study was the change in ONSD measurements associated with the fluid challenge, and the secondary outcome was the relationship between fluid responsiveness and the change in ONSD. Results: A total of 60 patients were included. The ONSD (mm) value was significantly higher at T1 compared to T0 (mean & PLUSMN; standard deviation: 5.12 & PLUSMN;0.30 mm vs. 5.10 & PLUSMN;0.32 mm; p=0.011). However, at T2, the ONSD was similar to that at T0 (5.10 & PLUSMN;0.31 mm vs. 5.10 & PLUSMN;0.32 mm; p=0.662). The stroke volume (mL) was also significantly higher at T1 and T2 compared to T0 [median IQR 60 (6) mL vs. 60 (4.7) mL vs. 52 (5) mL, respectively, p < 0.01]. No significant relationship was found between the ONSD and the change in fluid responsiveness (p=0.621). Conclusion: The fluid challenge test increases ONSD and may cause an increase in intracranial pressure.