Rural families food intake behaviour in relation to livelihood diversification, income differences and family size


ul Haq S., Boz İ., Shahbaz P., Murtaza M. R.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, cilt.44, sa.5, ss.481-498, 2020 (SSCI) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 44 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/ijcs.12580
  • Dergi Adı: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, ASSIA, International Bibliography of Social Sciences, ABI/INFORM, Business Source Elite, Business Source Premier, CAB Abstracts, Educational research abstracts (ERA), Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Index Islamicus, INSPEC, PAIS International, Psycinfo, Public Affairs Index, Sociological abstracts, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.481-498
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: consumption barriers, family size, food consumption, livelihood diversification, per capita income, rural families, SOCIOECONOMIC DETERMINANTS, CONSUMPTION, HEALTH, NUTRITION, FRUIT, INSIGHTS, YOUNG, LIFE
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The livelihood diversification significantly contributes to the family income having effect on food varieties' consumption in rural families of different sizes. This study investigated the food intake differences among rural families considering different income levels and family sizes. Moreover, barriers faced by the rural families to increase the consumption of food varieties were also analysed. A total of 200 rural families were selected through multistage purposive and random sampling techniques in the Punjab province of Pakistan and were directly interviewed and categorized first into low and high livelihood diversified families. The food groups were derived by assigning individual food to conventional food group taxonomies, and two-way ANOVA (4 (income groups) x 3 (family size groups) was separately conducted for low and high livelihood diversified families. The income instability, prices of food items, market distance and storage were perceived as barriers for increasing food consumption. The high livelihood diversified families significantly and regularly consumed more food items than low diversified families. The rural households both in low and high livelihood diversified family categories having low income and high family size consumed less expensive food items. The regular consumption of fruits, bakery products, and livestock and dairy items was greatly associated with high income and small family size. One of the most remarkable findings of the multivariate multiple regression model was the households belonging to the lowest income group were significantly lowering the consumption of livestock and dairy food items as the family size increased from small to large family size. The interaction effect was highly associated with per capita income because the consumption of food items increased with the rise in income irrespective of the family size. However, family size groups showed different patterns of food intakes with different income levels. Government agencies should assist rural households to diversify their income portfolios for better nutrition.