In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified Plating Techniques for Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Advancement


Sener I., Arıcı S., Bereket C., Tek M.

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, cilt.23, sa.5, ss.1573-1576, 2012 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 23 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2012
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31826100ec
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1573-1576
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy, mandibular advancement, biomechanic, three-dimensional test model, RIGID INTERNAL-FIXATION, FOLLOW-UP, SURGERY, STABILITY, STABILIZATION, SCREWS, SYSTEM
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of modified plate techniques using a newly designed three-dimensional test model after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Fifteen synthetic polyurethane mandibular replicas were used and divided into 3 groups. Self-tapping 6-mm titanium screws with an outer diameter of 2.0 mm and private designed plates produced by 316-L stainless steel were used in the study. After the osteotomy, the distal part was advanced by 5 mm. The jaw models were placed to the three-dimensional test model designed by the authors, and the Instron Lloyd LRX device was used to apply a double-sided tensile force from the mandible angulus region of each group. Resistance forces that caused a displacement of 1.5 and 3 mm were recorded with the Instron program. The mean (SD) of the 3 groups were calculated using analysis of variance and the Tukey test. The results were compared statistically, with values of P < 0.05 determined as statistically significant. On the basis of the results of the Tukey comparison within the groups, there was a statistically significant difference between groups 1 and 2 and between groups 1 and 3 at both 1.5- and 3-mm displacement (P G 0.05). No significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3 (P 9 0.05). This test model was able to identify the most appropriate plate type of 3 different modified plate techniques after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.