Comparative study on dry sliding wear and oxidation performance of HVOF and laser re-melted Al0.2CrFeNi(Co,Cu) alloys


ERDOGAN A., Döleker K. M.

Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition), cilt.31, sa.8, ss.2428-2441, 2021 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 31 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/s1003-6326(21)65664-9
  • Dergi Adı: Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition)
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Communication Abstracts, Compendex, INSPEC, Metadex, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2428-2441
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: high entropy alloy, HVOF, laser re-melting, oxidation, wear
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Al0.2CrFeNiCo and Al0.2CrFeNiCu high entropy alloys were deposited with high velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) on 316L substrate. Later, a laser re-melting (LR) process was applied to enhancing the coating microstructure. LR process effects on dry sliding wear and oxidation behaviors were investigated. The mixture of powders with free elements led to the formation of inner oxides in HVOF coatings. The oxide and porosity were eliminated using LR. After LR, FCC was the dominant phase in both alloys, while BCC, sigma and Cr2O3 phases were observed in Al0.2CrFeNiCo alloy. The hardnesses of the Al0.2CrFeNiCo and Al0.2CrFeNiCu coatings after HVOF were HV 591 and HV 361, respectively. After LR, the hardnesses decreased to HV 259 and HV 270, respectively. Although HVOF coatings were most affected by increased load, they showed the highest wear resistance compared to other samples. The lowest wear resistance could be seen in the substrate. After the oxidation tests, HVOF coating layer was completely oxidized and also, the coating layer was delaminated from the substrate after 50 h oxidation due to its porous structure. LR coatings exhibited better oxidation performance. Al0.2CrFeNiCo was dominantly composed of Cr2O3, exhibiting a slower-growing tendency at the end of the oxidation tests, while Al0.2CrFeNiCu was composed of spinel phases.