Preanalytical Errors in Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory and Relationship With Hospital Departments and Staff: A Record-Based Study


Creative Commons License

Dündar C., Bahadir O.

JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, cilt.19, sa.4, ss.239-242, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 19 Sayı: 4
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001115
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, PASCAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PAIS International
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.239-242
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: biochemistry lab, blood sample, preanalytical error, SPECIMEN REJECTION, QUALITY, IMPACT, COST
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

ObjectiveDespite many efforts to improve the overall quality of clinical laboratory service, errors that compromise patient safety and increase healthcare costs continue to occur even infrequently. We aimed to determine the causes of preanalytical errors and related factors by evaluating the laboratory records of a tertiary hospital.MethodsIn this retrospective study, 7,762,981 requests that were registered in the biochemistry laboratory records of Ondokuz Mayis University Health Practice and Research Center during 2019 were examined. All rejected samples were analyzed according to the department where they were collected and the reasons for rejection.ResultsOf the total sample rejections, 99,561 (74.8%) were preanalytical and 33,474 (25.2%) belonged to the analytical phase. The preanalytical rejection rate was 1.28%, with the highest rejection rate in the inpatients (2.26%) and the lowest in the outpatients (0.02%). Insufficient sample (43.7%), clotted sample (35.1%), and inappropriate sample (11.1%) were the first 3 rows of rejection reasons. It was determined that sample rejection rates were low during routine working hours and high during nonworking hours.ConclusionsPreanalytical errors were most common in inpatient wards and were most likely due to incorrect phlebotomy techniques. Education of health personnel on good laboratory practices, systematic monitoring of errors, and the development of quality indicators will play an important role in reducing the vulnerability of the preanalytical phase.