Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES, cilt.47, sa.4, ss.507-525, 2020 (AHCI)
Literature on Turkey's post-2011 authoritarian turn - especially after the eruption of the 2013 nationwide Gezi Protests - adopts modern concepts such as 'dictatorship', 'authoritarianism', 'totalitarianism', 'one-party government', 'party-state fusion', and even 'fascism' mainly in order to pin down the nature of the Justice and Development Party (AKP, Turkish acronym) or depict the current character of Turkey's regime. Through engaging the pre-modern concept of neopatrimonialism, which is derived from Max Weber's concept of patrimonialism, this paper argues that Turkey's encounter with authoritarianism is deeply associated with the proliferation of neopatrimonial domination, into which the legacy of patronage politics, fracture of security power, and the metastasis of crony capitalism have been conflated. This article argues that neopatrimonial features have always, to a degree, marked state-society relations in Turkey. Furthermore, this article suggests neopatrimonial characteristics started to dominate Turkey's modern legal structure under the AKP, which led to a state crisis culminating in the 2016 attempted coup. However, despite the fact that neopatrimonialism cannot be argued as a pathological deviation from modern-legal domination, this paper concludes that tension exists between the crony capitalism-based economic model of neopatrimonalism and Turkey's decades-long market-based capitalism.