Evaluations of Kamaladdin Ibnu'l-Humam for Isnad of Rivayat

Özüdoğru B.

DINBILIMLERI AKADEMIK ARASTIRMA DERGISI-JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN RELIGIOUS SCIENCES, cilt.17, sa.3, ss.125-155, 2017 (ESCI) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 17 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2017
  • Dergi Adı: DINBILIMLERI AKADEMIK ARASTIRMA DERGISI-JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN RELIGIOUS SCIENCES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.125-155
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Ibnu'l-Humam, Rivayat, Isnad, Zahiri inkita (apparent disconnection), Mursal
  • Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

There are lots of works to be authored to fix the sunnah as the second source of Islam and to understand it rightly. Ibnu'l-Humam as an Hanafi scholar, wrote a commentary on al-Hidaya, one of the most important sources of Islamic Jurisprudence, in his Fathu'l Qadir. In His Fathu'l Qadir, he gave a place many rivayat for and against. From this aspect, on this work that reminiscent a hadith book, had been evaluated rivayats rather than isnad by means rarely encountered in Hanafi's books. In this study, will be deal evaluations of Ibnu'l-humam to disconnection for isnad (mursal, mudallas, munkati hadith) and done comparing to evaluations of muhaddis.